University ranking has become a popular way for students, parents, researchers, faculty members and funders to benchmark universities nationally, regionally and globally. In addition, it is a key tool for marketing universities and attracting talent, students and collaborations. However, university rankings are diverse and imperfect — and can have an unintended impact on your institution’s reputation and ability to achieve its unique mission.
University rankings are complex and multifaceted, relying on a variety of data points such as student satisfaction surveys, faculty-to-student ratio, bibliometric indicators like the number of research articles, graduate school admissions tests (SAT, GMAT) and more. They are also often heavily weighted by proxies, such as the number of Nobel-prize winning alumni or the value of a university’s endowments. These factors, along with algorithm bias, can lead to wildly different outcomes across ranking systems and can create mismatches between students’ expectations and their college choices.
Despite these limitations, rankings remain an important part of the higher education landscape. They can serve as a useful starting point in a student’s college search and help them identify schools that might be good fits for their interests, academic strengths, career goals, and budget. They can also help students broaden their search to include institutions they may not have considered previously.
While some critics have argued that ranking systems are biased and overemphasize certain aspects of the university experience, the landscape is evolving toward a greater emphasis on transparency, inclusion, and real-world student outcomes. For example, UNIRANKS is a newer ranking system that is pioneering an open, data-driven approach to assessing universities and colleges.
About the Author
